- SONY VEGAS MOVIE STUDIO HD PLATINUM 11 FAST RENDER SETTINGS 720P
- SONY VEGAS MOVIE STUDIO HD PLATINUM 11 FAST RENDER SETTINGS UPDATE
- SONY VEGAS MOVIE STUDIO HD PLATINUM 11 FAST RENDER SETTINGS UPGRADE
- SONY VEGAS MOVIE STUDIO HD PLATINUM 11 FAST RENDER SETTINGS SOFTWARE
- SONY VEGAS MOVIE STUDIO HD PLATINUM 11 FAST RENDER SETTINGS CODE
I use a single HD (well, a pair in RAID 1) for both source and output.
SONY VEGAS MOVIE STUDIO HD PLATINUM 11 FAST RENDER SETTINGS 720P
12:30 1080p source to 720p out, took 9:30, cpu at about 90% throughout, HD light more off than on.
I just ran a gpu assisted test render here on my i5 (4 core) using Movie Studio 12.0. Look at the HD activity light(s), if it's on all the time then the HD is probably the bottleneck, if the light is flashing more often off than on the HD is probably not the bottleneck. If the cpu is not at or near 100% (4 cores, forget about the other 4 for now) then it is waiting for something else to finish.
SONY VEGAS MOVIE STUDIO HD PLATINUM 11 FAST RENDER SETTINGS UPGRADE
Q1) Why the discrepancy between the CPU usage on the two machine? Why does it not use 100% (yes I have set the app priority to max) Q2) How much rendering speed increase could I expect by moving to a higher spec machine? And what would be the specs of the most reasonable cost machine I could upgrade to improve my rendering speed by say double? The older machine at the lab I also do some rendering on that has 4 cores, maxes out all 4 cores at 100% during rendering. However, my CPU usage graph shows only 4 of the 8 cores cores being used during rendering at under 50% usage. I'm getting just over real time rendering speed, so a 1 hour video takes just under an hour to render. I have an HP DV7 notebook Win 7 64bit i7 processor 2630QM (8 core) with 16Gb or memory and render to a 2nd 7200rpm hard drive, and a Radeon GPU for some speedup. Quote from: EEVblog on April 02, 2013, 09:18:10 am There might be someone on here who knows about this: I'm using Sony Movie Studio Platinum 12 and rendering using the Sony AVC encoder. For an answer on expected performance for a given hardware/software config, I'd suggest visiting I just have my favourite command lines for config settings and really shudder at the thought of allowing a fly be night propriety program to touch created content. It the risk of getting all ranty, I would have thought if you paid money for both the windows OS and the sony software, you'd think that you'd get better management and utilisation of the cpu and perhaps a bit more intuitiveness so you could the best out of it.
SONY VEGAS MOVIE STUDIO HD PLATINUM 11 FAST RENDER SETTINGS CODE
Add the multi core mojo on top of that and and the stinking dog turd Windows must be to code for, it's a wonder anything works at all. From idle to near real-time time slices for processes it all depends on the application and the OS and their ability to work together. And depending on the OS, and it's permissions, the OS can allow or forbid levels of priority. An application has to tell the OS how much priority to give any process it is using. For the answer to question two, it depends. With my i7, I found that setting cores to 6 yielded the best speed. I don't know windows at all but I use mencoder or sometimes ffmpeg over on the Linux. And since they're both internal, they're sharing the bus, effectively halving the max read/write rates to each drive. EDIT#3: And I just saw your response about both drives being internal. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that you're limiting by the writing over the USB port. If you got one with the latest i7-3770K, 32+GB of good, fast DDR, a few SSDs in a RAID config. Switching over to the latest/greatest/fastest/bestest desktop out there to get double speed? meh.maybe. I don't see twice the speed coming out of it. All in all, 2.8GHz vs 2.0GHz, 32GB vs 16GB.
If they were dropping off 100% often enough, I'd think the USB interface would be a limiting factor. That should be fast enough since the cores you are using are max'd out. I'm assuming the 2nd HD is on the USB3.0 port. That'll get you 2.8GHz vs 2.0GHz, with a bit more 'turbo', but since you're max'ing out the cores, the turbo speeds will be limited to heat generated, as well as 2MB more of 元 cache. The motherboard should handle an i7-3840QM, again with a BIOS update, if you can find one for cheap.
HD is a bit limited at the SATA2 spec vs SATA3, but I don't think that'll affect rendering speeds, which in this case are likely going to be CPU limited. I saw a couple of pages talking about a BIOS hack that allows it, but didn't look too trustworthy.
SONY VEGAS MOVIE STUDIO HD PLATINUM 11 FAST RENDER SETTINGS UPDATE
Maybe a BIOS update and some new chips could take you up to 32GB. 16GB is the max memory for the HP DV7 models. What CPU does the other machine have? EDIT: Checked around a bit.
SONY VEGAS MOVIE STUDIO HD PLATINUM 11 FAST RENDER SETTINGS SOFTWARE
Depends on how the software is written whether or not those other "4 cores" will be used or not.
0 kommentar(er)
